Psychological Testing

PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING {PSY 3223}
  • Course overview
      Main objective
ü  Provide introduction to theory and research relating to psychological testing (PT)
      Coverage
ü  Ten modules: Nature of PT, History of PT, Settings for PT,  Application of PT, Test construction, administration and  interpretation, characteristics of a good test,    personality testing, intelligence and aptitude testing,  attitude, values and interests, challenges of testing.
      Mode of delivery: Lectures, presentations, Classroom  discussions
      Assessment: Assignments, tests, UE.

MODULE 1
  • NATURE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING
Introduction
      All fields of human endeavour use testing in some form, and each field has is own set of testing tools and measuring units. As a student of psychological testing you need a working familiarity with some of the commonly used testing tools in psychology.
Understanding Psychological Testing
  • To better understand psychological testing one needs to understand what a test is.  The concept test has been defined variously by different psychologists.
Ø  Anastasi (1988) defines a test as an objective and standardized measure of a sample of behaviour. This definition is characterized by three elements that are worth noting, namely objectivity,  standardization and sample of behaviour
ü   Objectivity: Most of the aspects of a test, such as how the test is scored and how the score is interpreted are not a function of the subjective decision of a particular examiner but are based on objective criteria
ü   Standardization: No matter who administers, scores and interpretes the test, there is uniformity of procedures.
ü  A sample of behaviour:  A test is not a psychological x-ray nor does it necessarily reveal hidden conflicts and forbidden wishes; it is a sample of a person’s behaviour, hopefully a representative sample from which we can draw some inferences and hypotheses
Ø  Kaplan and Saccuzzo (2005) consider a test as a measurement device or technique used to quantify behaviour or aid in understanding and prediction of behaviour
  • A test  is made up of items (a specific stimulus) to which a person responds overtly and which is scored or evaluated
  • From the afore-mentioned definitions of a test we can define a psychological test as set of items designed to measure characteristics of human beings that pertain to behaviour
  • A psychological test thus is systematic procedure for obtaining samples of behaviour relevant to cognitive or affective functioning , and for scoring and evaluating those samples.
Ø  Systematic procedure: Is characterized by planning, uniformity and thoroughness (i.e. the test must be demonstrably objective and fair to be of use
Ø  Sample of behaviour: Are small subset of a much larger whole (i.e. sampling is efficient  because time is available is always limited
Ø  Relevant to cognitive /affective functioning  or behaviour: The samples are selected for their empirical or practical psychological significance
Ø  Evaluated and scored: some numerical or category system is applied to test the results  according to the pre-established rules so as avoid questions about what the results of the test are.
Ø  Standards- based empirical data: There has to be a way of applying a common yardstick or criteria  to test the results. The standards used to evaluate  test results lend the only meaning those results are.
Why are psychological tests described as standardized?
Ø   They involve a uniform procedure in all aspects  of the administration, scoring and interpretation.
ü  Naturally, the time and place where a test is administered as well as the circumstances under which it is administered and the examiner who administers it affect the test results.
ü  However, the purpose of standardizing test procedures is to make all the variables that are under the control of the examiner as uniform as possible so that every one who takes the test will be taking it in the same way.
ü  They involve evaluating test results. The standards are most often norms derived from a group of individuals known as normative or standardized samples.


Psychological Testing  Vs Psychological Assessment
  • In contrast to process of psychological testing which involves the administering, scoring and interpreting test results, psychological assessment may be conceived as a problem solving process that can take many different forms.
  • How psychological assessment proceeds depends on many factors, not the least of which  is the reason for assessing different tools of evaluation, psychological tests being among them. Thus, psychological assessment depends on the particular objectives , people and circumstances involved as
            well as other variables unique to a particular situation.
The differences between psychological test and psychological assessment
Ø  Admittedly, the line btn what constitutes testing and what constitutes assessment is not always as we might like it to be. However, it is useful to distinguish the differences between testing and assessment in terms of objective, process, and outcome of an evaluation and also in terms of the role of and skill of the evaluator
Ø  i. Objective: Typically, the objective of testing is to obtain some gauge usually numerical in nature with regard to an ability or attribute. The objective of assessment is typically to answer a referral question or to arrive at a decision through the use of tools of evaluation
Ø  ii. Process: Testing may be individual or group in nature. After test administration, the tester will typically add up the number of correct answers of the number of certain types of responses with little if any regard for the how or mechanics of such content. Assessment is typically individualized, focusing on how individual processes rather than simply the results of the processing.
 iii. Role of evaluator: In testing, the role of evaluator is not key to the process. One tester may be substituted for another tester without appreciably affecting the results. In assessment, the evaluator is key to the process of selecting the tests and/or tools of evaluation as well as in drawing conclusions from the entire evaluation
iv. Skills of evaluation: Testing typically requires technician-like skills of administering and scoring a test as well as in interpreting the results. Assessment typically requires an educated selection of tools of evaluation, and thoughtful organization and integration of data
iv. Outcome:  Typically, testing yields a test score or series of test scores. Assessment typically entails a logical problem solving approach that brings to bear many sources of data designed to solve a referral question

Psychological testing VS Psychological assessment
Several tools are used in psychological testing:
i. The test: As already defined a psychological test is a measuring device or procedure designed to measure variables related to psychology, such as intelligence, personality, aptitude, interest, attitude and values. Psychological tests almost always involve analysis of a sample of behaviour which could range from responses to a pencil-and-paper questionnaire to oral responses to questions,  to performance of some tasks.
            Psychological tests may differ with respect to a number of variables such as content, format, administration procedures, scoring and interpretation procedures and technical quality.
ii. The interview: In psychological testing the interview involves more than talking (as in face-to-face interview). The interviewer is taking note of not only the content of what is said but also the way it is said. The interviewer takes note of both verbal and non verbal behaviours, such as interviewees body of language, movement, and facial expressions in response to the interviewer, the extent of eye contact, and the apparent willingness to cooperate. The interviewer may also take note of the way the interviewee is dressed
iii. Portfolio: These are files of work products that can be retained in form of paper, canvas, film, video, audio or some other medium. As samples of ones ability and accomplishments, a portfolio can be used as a tool for evaluation.
iv. Case history data: Refers to records, transcripts and other accounts in written, pictorial or other form that preserve archival information, official and informal accounts , and other data and items relevant to an assessee.
            The may include files or excerpts from files maintained at institutions and agencies such as schools, hospitals, employers, religious institutions and criminal justice agencies. Other examples of case history data  are letters and written correspondences, photos and family albums, newspaper and magazine clippings and home video, novels and audio tapes.
iv. Behavioural observation:  is defined as monitoring the actions of others or oneself by visual or electronic means while recoding quantitative and qualitative information regarding the actions
v. Role play tests: Is defined as acting an improvised or partially improvised part in a simulated situation. It is a tool of assessment wherein assessees are directed to act as if they were in a particular situation. Assessee may then be evaluated with regard to their expressed thoughts, behaviours, abilities, and other variables . Role play is useful in evaluating various skills including grocery shopping skills etc.
vi. Computer as tools: Computers may also be helpful in measurement of variables that in the past were difficult to quantify. Specifically, their role as tools for assessment lies in test administration, scoring and interpretation

Assumptions About Psychological testing
1: Psychological traits and states exist
Ø  A trait refers to any distinguishable, relatively enduring way in which one individual varies from another”. Thousands of psychological trait terms can be found in the English language. Among them are psychological traits that relate to intelligence, specific intellectual abilities, cognitive style, adjustment, interests, attitudes, sexual orientation and preferences, psychopathology, personality in general, and specific personality traits.

ii. Psychological traits and states can be quantified and measured
Ø  Having acknowledged that psychological traits and states do exist, the specific traits and states to be measured and quantified need to be carefully defined. Test developers and researchers have many different ways of looking at and defining the same phenomenon.
iii. Test-related behavior predicts non-test-related behavior
Ø  The objective of tests is to provide some indication of other aspects of the examinee’s behavior.
iv. Tests and other measurement techniques have strengths and weaknesses
Ø  Competent test users understand a great deal about the tests they use. They under-stand, among other things, how a test was developed, the circumstances under which it is appropriate to administer the test, how the test should be administered and to whom, and how the test results should be interpreted.
v. Various sources of error are part of the assessment process
vi. Testing and assessment can be conducted in a fair and unbiased manner
Vii. Testing and Assessment Benefit Society




 lecture two
 go to the next page






No comments:

Post a Comment